Months (range 18 - 68) was performed. During this period, 10 cardiovascular events (11.8 ) were reported: one unstable angina (1.2 ), seven strokes (8.2 ) and two cardiovascular deaths (2.4 ) ?Table 5. No events were observed in patients with zero CS (0 vs. 19.2 , p = 0.007) or without atherosclerotic plaques (0 vs. 17.5 , p = 0.018), both presenting a negative predictive value of 100 . Seven ev
Ory power among predictor models. In assessing cardiovascular events, the Combined model was significantly better than GFR (difference between AUC: 0.150, 95 CI 0.004-0.260, p = 0.008) and showed a trend for a higher discriminatory power than Framingham (difference between AUC: 0.184, p = 0.052), age (difference between AUC: 0.135, p = 0.078 and the Clinical model (difference between AUC: 0.065, p
Age 8 ofTable 9 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluation for CVEV predictionPrediction of CVEV: ROC analysis Framingham Glomerular filtration rate Age Calcium score Clinical model Clinical-CS model CT model Combined model ROC comparisons - Combined model vs: Glomerular filtration rate Framingham Age Calcium score Clinical model Clinical-CS model CT model AUC 0.704 0.262 0.753 0.808