Han 86.6 (vs. 86.6) and obstructive CAD is presented in Figure 1. Different prediction models were created based on clinical and CT predictors of cardiovascular events. ROC curve analysis for the isolated parameters andTable 8 Predictors of cardiovascular events by Cox regression analysisPredictors of CVEV: Cox regression Age Glomerular filtration rate Absence of obstructive coronary artery diseas
Han 86.6 (vs. 86.6) and obstructive CAD is presented in Figure 1. Different prediction models were created based on clinical and CT predictors of cardiovascular events. ROC curve analysis for the isolated parameters andTable 8 Predictors of cardiovascular events by Cox regression analysisPredictors of CVEV: Cox regression Age Glomerular filtration rate Absence of obstructive coronary artery diseas
Level (p) are shown. Legend: GFR - Glomerular Filtration Rate. Presented parameters are related to initial assessment and data obtained by Computed tomography.were initiated on statins, which was a significant change (p = 0.041). Treatment with an antiplatelet agent, a statin or percutaneous revascularisation was started in 17.6 of patients following CT, which was also a significant change (p = 0
Level (p) are shown. Legend: GFR - Glomerular Filtration Rate. Presented parameters are related to initial assessment and data obtained by Computed tomography.were initiated on statins, which was a significant change (p = 0.041). Treatment with an antiplatelet agent, a statin or percutaneous revascularisation was started in 17.6 of patients following CT, which was also a significant change (p = 0
Mma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor, subunit 2 P.AILKLLKH.Y Gamma-aminobutyric-acid receptor pi subunit R.GLEHLRLAQYTIERYFTL.V Gastric cancer-related protein GCYS-20 R.CVAAVSSVPKIVDWMDN.F GCP170 S.TDSPLPLEK.E Gelsolin , plasma (Actin-depolymerizing factor) K.HVVPNEVVVQR.L K.AGALNSNDAFVLK.T K.PALPAGTEDTAK.E K.TGAQELLR.V F.FTGDAYVILK.T K.DSQEEEKTEALTSAK.R K.TPSAAYLWVGTGASEAEK.T R.DPDQTDGLGLSYLSSH.
Of CS to identify cardiovascular events was 86.6, with 80 sensitivity (vs. 20 for CS 86.6, p
Ria (mg/24h), mean ?sd Glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1,73m2), mean ?sd Waist circunference (cm), mean ?sd Current smoking, n ( )Legend: p ?significance level.At CT 21.0 ?11.6 158 ?18 4.5 ?1.3 2.7 ?1.1 0.7 ?0.5 1.4 ?1.3 7.8 ?1.7 61.2 ?132.4 98.4 ?25.7 104 ?9 8 (9.4 )At follow-up 20.8 ?9.60 145 ?21 4.4 ?1.1 2.4 ?0.9 0.8 ?0.4 1.2 ?0.4 7.2 ?1.5 41.8 ?97.5 80 ?26.1 106 ?10 5 (5.9 )p ns
Oronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1663?669. Anand DV, Lim E, Hopkins D, Corder R, Ahaw LJ, Sharp P, Lipkin D, Lahiri A: Risk stratification in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes: prospective evaluation of the combined use of coronary artery calcium imaging and selective myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J 2006, 27:713?21.doi:10