Use of the monitors and asked them to return at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks to download data from the monitors. Research assistants did not review recorded adherence data with participants. The protocolEthics StatementEach participant provided written informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB), the University of Maryland IRB
Use of the monitors and asked them to return at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks to download data from the monitors. Research assistants did not review recorded adherence data with participants. The protocolEthics StatementEach participant provided written informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB), the University of Maryland IRB
Use of the monitors and asked them to return at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks to download data from the monitors. Research assistants did not review recorded adherence data with participants. The protocolEthics StatementEach participant provided written informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB), the University of Maryland IRB
Studies evaluatingOns to the statistical methods used in this study.Studies evaluating the efficacy of directly administered antiretroviral therapy (DAART) for the treatment of HIV-infected individuals have yielded mixed results. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials by Ford and colleagues found no evidence overall for DAART benefit [1]. However, both the Ford anal
Studies evaluatingOns to the statistical methods used in this study.Studies evaluating the efficacy of directly administered antiretroviral therapy (DAART) for the treatment of HIV-infected individuals have yielded mixed results. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials by Ford and colleagues found no evidence overall for DAART benefit [1]. However, both the Ford anal
N ( ) Homeless, self-described, n ( ) Receiving public assistance or social security disability, n ( ) Employed, n ( ) CES-D short-form scorea, median (IQR) 44 (85) 8 (15) 47 (42?2) 29 (56) 20 (39) 41 (79) 8 (15) 11 (5?6) 44 (80) 11 (20) 47 (41?1) 27 (49) 12 (23) 50 (91) 8 (15) 11 (6?5) 19 (37) 17 (33) 4 (8) 7 (13) 5 (10) 27 (52) 20 (36) 18 (33) 4 (7) 7 (13) 6 (11) 24 (44)Substance abuse relatedDu
N ( ) Homeless, self-described, n ( ) Receiving public assistance or social security disability, n ( ) Employed, n ( ) CES-D short-form scorea, median (IQR) 44 (85) 8 (15) 47 (42?2) 29 (56) 20 (39) 41 (79) 8 (15) 11 (5?6) 44 (80) 11 (20) 47 (41?1) 27 (49) 12 (23) 50 (91) 8 (15) 11 (6?5) 19 (37) 17 (33) 4 (8) 7 (13) 5 (10) 27 (52) 20 (36) 18 (33) 4 (7) 7 (13) 6 (11) 24 (44)Substance abuse relatedDu
N ( ) Homeless, self-described, n ( ) Receiving public assistance or social security disability, n ( ) Employed, n ( ) CES-D short-form scorea, median (IQR) 44 (85) 8 (15) 47 (42?2) 29 (56) 20 (39) 41 (79) 8 (15) 11 (5?6) 44 (80) 11 (20) 47 (41?1) 27 (49) 12 (23) 50 (91) 8 (15) 11 (6?5) 19 (37) 17 (33) 4 (8) 7 (13) 5 (10) 27 (52) 20 (36) 18 (33) 4 (7) 7 (13) 6 (11) 24 (44)Substance abuse relatedDu