Es 3B and S3). We decided to use this cell line because of a smaller ratio between HIV transcripts and *mRNA in these cells compared to those in J-Lat 9.2 cells (Figure 2D, bars 3 and 4). The ratio between LTRand Rev-containing transcripts increased with the decreased levels of viral expression consistent with the rational equation (see Supplemental text 2), and revealed that the upstream transcri
M the two homologous alleles is possible. Nevertheless, these results are in a good agreement with the findings obtained by Northern blotting (Figures 1B and 1D). Taken together, the *mRNAs represent the host-viral chimeric transcripts, which contain sequences of the 5'LTR and terminate at its pA signals. In addition, RT-DqPCR revealed that levels of *mRNA exceed those of viral mRNA in unstimulate
M the two homologous alleles is possible. Nevertheless, these results are in a good agreement with the findings obtained by Northern blotting (Figures 1B and 1D). Taken together, the *mRNAs represent the host-viral chimeric transcripts, which contain sequences of the 5'LTR and terminate at its pA signals. In addition, RT-DqPCR revealed that levels of *mRNA exceed those of viral mRNA in unstimulate
Pelleted in a conical tube and washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline. Sonication and immunoprecipitation were performed using Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay Kit (Upstate) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Antibodies used are presented in Table S2. As negative control, normal rabbit or mouse serum (Sigma-Aldrich) was used. Appropriate primer pairs (Table S1) were used t
Me transcription through the provirus, since slight enrichment of elongating RNAPII in the HIV coding region of transcriptionally silent J-Lat 9.2 cells was observed using ChIPqPCR assay. However, transcription originating from the host promoter, ignoring pA sites in both LTRs and consequently splicing out the provirus together with the host intron (Han et al., 2004) is most likely less frequent t
T the level of gene expression act cooperatively to establish and maintain HIV latency. In conclusion, our study reveals that TI represents a key mechanism that antagonizes proviral gene expression to promote the latency of HIV. Furthermore, it demonstrates several means that could be used to counteract TI for reactivating latent HIV. Future mechanistic studies linking TI and other transcriptional
T the level of gene expression act cooperatively to establish and maintain HIV latency. In conclusion, our study reveals that TI represents a key mechanism that antagonizes proviral gene expression to promote the latency of HIV. Furthermore, it demonstrates several means that could be used to counteract TI for reactivating latent HIV. Future mechanistic studies linking TI and other transcriptional
T the level of gene expression act cooperatively to establish and maintain HIV latency. In conclusion, our study reveals that TI represents a key mechanism that antagonizes proviral gene expression to promote the latency of HIV. Furthermore, it demonstrates several means that could be used to counteract TI for reactivating latent HIV. Future mechanistic studies linking TI and other transcriptional